Both RAISERROR and THROW statements are used to raise an error in Sql Server. The journey of RAISERROR started from Sql Server 2005, where as the journey of THROW statement has just began with Sql Server 2012. obviously, Microsoft suggesting us to start using THROW statement instead of RAISERROR. THROW statement seems to be simple and easy to use than RAISERROR.
Below table lists-out 10 major difference between RAISERROR and THROW with examples:
| RAISERROR | THROW |
| Version of the Sql Server in which it is introduced? | |
| Introduced in SQL SERVER 2005. And as per BOL, Microsoft is suggesting to start using THROW statement instead of RAISERROR in New Applications. | Introduced in SQL SERVER 2012. THROW statement seems to be simple and easy to use than RAISERROR. |
| SYNTAX | |
RAISERROR
( { msg_id | msg_str
| @local_variable }
{ ,severity ,state }
[ ,argument [ ,...n ] ] )
[ WITH option [ ,...n ] ]
|
THROW
[ { error_number
| @local_variable },
{ message | @local_variable },
{ state | @local_variable } ]
[ ; ]
|
| Can re-throw the original exception that invoked the CATCH block? | |
NO. It always generates new exception and results in the loss of the original exception details. Below example demonstrates this:
BEGIN TRY
DECLARE @result INT
--Generate divide-by-zero error
SET @result = 55/0
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
--Get the details of the error
--that invoked the CATCH block
DECLARE
@ErMessage NVARCHAR(2048),
@ErSeverity INT,
@ErState INT
SELECT
@ErMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE(),
@ErSeverity = ERROR_SEVERITY(),
@ErState = ERROR_STATE()
RAISERROR (@ErMessage,
@ErSeverity,
@ErState )
END CATCH
RESULT: NOTE:The actual line number of the code which generated Divided By Zero error here is 4, but the exception message returned by RAISERROR is showiung it as 19. Also the error number corresponding to divide by zero error is 8134 in the SYS.Messages table, but the one returned by RAISERROR is 50000. |
YES. To Re-THROW the original exception caught in the TRY Block, we can just specify the THROW statement without any parameters in the CATCH block. Below example demonstrates this:
BEGIN TRY
DECLARE @result INT
--Generate divide-by-zero error
SET @result = 55/0
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
THROW
END CATCH
RESULT: With above example it is clear that THROW statement is very simple for RE-THROWING the exception. And also it returns correct error number and line number. |
| Causes the statement batch to be ended? | |
Example 1: In the below Batch of statements the PRINT statement after RAISERROR statement will be executed.
BEGIN
PRINT 'BEFORE RAISERROR'
RAISERROR('RAISERROR TEST',16,1)
PRINT 'AFTER RAISERROR'
END
RESULT: BEFORE RAISERROR Example 2: In the below example all the statement’s after RAISERROR statement are executed.
BEGIN TRY
DECLARE @RESULT INT = 55/0
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
PRINT 'BEFORE RAISERROR';
--Get the details of the error
--that invoked the CATCH block
DECLARE
@ErMessage NVARCHAR(2048),
@ErSeverity INT,
@ErState INT
SELECT
@ErMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE(),
@ErSeverity = ERROR_SEVERITY(),
@ErState = ERROR_STATE()
RAISERROR (@ErMessage,
@ErSeverity,
@ErState )
PRINT 'AFTER RAISERROR'
END CATCH
PRINT 'AFTER CATCH'
RESULT: |
Example 1: In the below Batch of statements the PRINT statement after THROW statement will not executed. BEGIN PRINT 'BEFORE THROW'; THROW 50000,'THROW TEST',1 PRINT 'AFTER THROW' END RESULT: BEFORE THROW Example 2: In the below example no PRINT statement’s after THROW statement are executed. BEGIN TRY DECLARE @RESULT INT = 55/0 END TRY BEGIN CATCH PRINT 'BEFORE THROW'; THROW; PRINT 'AFTER THROW' END CATCH PRINT 'AFTER CATCH' RESULT: |
| CAN SET SEVERITY LEVEL? | |
| YES. The severity parameter specifies the severity of the exception. | NO. There is no severity parameter. The exception severity is always set to 16. (unless re-throwing in a CATCH block) |
| Requires preceding statement to end with semicolon (;) statement terminator? | |
| NO. | YES. The statement before the THROW statement must be followed by the semicolon (;) statement terminator. |
| CAN RAISE SYSTEM ERROR MESSAGE? The SYS.MESSAGES Table will have both system-defined and user-defined messages. Message IDs less than 50000 are system messages. |
|
|
YES. With RAISERROR we can raise the System Exception. br> Example: br> RAISERROR (40655,16,1) RESULT: |
NO. With THROW we can’t raise the System Exception. But when it used in CATCH BLOCK it can Re-THROW the system exception.
Example: Trying to raise system exception (i.e. exception with ErrorNumber less than 50000). THROW 40655, ‘Database master cannot be restored.’, 1 RESULT: |
| CAN RAISE user-defined message with message_id greater than 50000 which is not defined in SYS.MESSAGES table? | |
| NO. If a msg_id is passed to RAISERROR, the ID must be defined in sys.messages.
Example: RAISERROR (60000, 16, 1) RESULT: Now add the Message to SYS.MESSAGES Table by using the below statement: EXEC sys.sp_addmessage 60000, 16, ‘Test User Defined Message’ Now try to Raise the Error: RESULT: |
YES. The error_number parameter does not have to be defined in sys.messages.
Example: RESULT: |
| Allows substitution parameters in the message parameter? By using the below statement add a sample test message with parameteres to the SYS.Messages Table: EXEC sp_addmessage 70000,16,‘Message with Parameter 1: %d and Parameter 2:%s’ |
|
| YES.The msg_str parameter can contain printf formatting styles.
Example 1: RAISERROR (70000, 16, 1, 505,‘Basavaraj’ ) RESULT: |
NO.The message parameter does not accept printf style formatting.
Example 1: THROW 70000, ‘Message with Parameter 1: %d and Parameter 2:%s’, 1, 505,’Basavaraj’ RESULT: Alternative Way of doing this is: Example 2: Message manipulation is not allowed in the THROW statement Below statement will fail THROW 58000,‘String1′ + ‘ String2′,1 RESULT: We can solve such problems, we can prepare the message prior to the THROW statement and then pass it to throw statement as a variable. Below example illustrates this. DECLARE @message NVARCHAR(2048) RESULT: |